Modern art has become increasingly popular over the years, but there are still many who believe that modern art just doesn’t measure up to the art of the masters of the past. After all, the artists of the past were some of the most influential and inspiring figures in history. They helped to shape the way we think about art, and their works remain timeless classics that still have relevance today.
Modern art, on the other hand, often consists of abstract and sometimes even jarring compositions that are designed to provoke thought or even shock. While modern art can sometimes be creative and thought-provoking, it often lacks the subtlety and elegance of the classic masters. The works of those who came before often contained deeper meaning and emotion, something that is often missing in much of modern art of today.
In addition, there is something to be said for how modern art is often viewed. Whereas the masters of the past were often seen as geniuses and even as gods, modern artists are often seen as mere provocateurs who are only out to shock and offend. Modern art often fails to evoke the same levels of emotion, thought, and awe as the masters of the past.
The world of modern art is an interesting one, and it does have its merits. But when compared to the works of the masters of the past, modern art often fails to measure up. While modern art can be thought-provoking and creative, it usually lacks the deeper meaning and emotion that the works of the masters of the past so often contained.